Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-25981649-20160720213905/@comment-26149161-20160722134014

LordDainTheAwsome wrote:

High King Ithilion wrote: They may be generic, but they are the canon ones :P

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lome) 21:28, July 21, 2016 (UTC) Ithilion, there is something you need to understand. You can't have full canon stuff for everything. You just can't. It also needs to look good and interesting, that you can see it was from that faction, and something that generic just isn't that. Also, i'd like to remind you that a good part of our current users and a majority of our new users came here from the movies, not the books, so to slam the boring chainmail armour in their faces would be a severe dissapointment to new users, wanting to see the badass movie gear, and instead having a load of chainmail. I know it's more canon to get more chain, but it just wouldn't work. Buuuuuuttttttt... I see you made so many textures, you could make a texture pack out of it! Put it on the texturepack page and wham! Everything looks how you wish it, without making it annoying for others! I already have made a book texture pack. But I don't think you understand what I'm trying to do. The Uruk-hai chestplate is the most boring in the entire pack, as it is purely chainmail. Here are some other "Canon" armors I have made. I think you'll agree that they aren't boring and generic, and many of them are in fact movie-based. Things can be canon without being dull. I don't want everyone to look like Normans in conical helms and chainmail. That's dull. I keep the movie helms, the general style, all of it. All I change is a chestplate.