Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-25987328-20160413230109/@comment-27598543-20160905121053

Eoros wrote: I didn't read any of the past comments, in case you care, but here is my opinion:

LOTR Films: I enjoyed them thoroughly, but the books are superior. Yes, some canonical errors, but it was overall a good film, especially if you are an outsider and wouldn't notice or care about the canonical errors.

The Hobbit Films: Oh boy... where to begin...

I will say straight up, I didn't like the Hobbit movies at all (except for the first one). For one thing, I didn't like the CGI. Next, Tauriel was stupid and non-lore, and uttterly pointless. Third, the Battle of the Five Armies was so boring (literally just mindless fighting), and I strongly feel that Tauriel should have died in that battle. She got smashed on the head by Bolg hard enough to break anyone's spine, and either instantly kill them, or paralyze them/K.O them, leaving them open to a kill.

Ugh, just watch CinemaSins's videos on the Hobbit films... they make lots of good points, while being  humorous. With the LotR films I can totally agree with you,BUT with the hobbit films not in all points.

Tauriel was un-canon and she was for totally non-sense in the movies,also this "little" love story with Killi had no sense and was unnecessary.

Yes,the CGI also was not the best,but Peter Jackson had not much time for the 3rd movie,because Warner Brothers was forceing him.And there were many un-canon and non-sense parts because of Warner Brothers,so to all people: stop hating PJ,hate Warner Brothers!

(If you haven't try,you should watch the extend Edition,there the Battle is much better ^^)