Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-47.41.55.73-20200126012758/@comment-25931200-20200212171615

BlueGoldenRose wrote: Jeez I don't even remember commenting on this. Now, fanfiction. THIS MOD IS FANFICTION. Get a grip and stop arguing blatantly without sufficient evidence. I got sick of reading half-way through this discussion, but continued despite this. Now, you might argue "Blah blah blah so this conflicts with stuff," but in reality the mobs themselves are definitely 'lore-friendly' and is one of the things I was just fine with in the game's lore. I, personally, have found SoM and SoW to not be lore-friendly. Yet the creatures really aren't that contradictory (specifically graugs and caragors as I don't care much for the ghuls). Also, BraveSold!3r, they're talking specifically of Far Harad, as in relating to Taurethrim and Morewaith and the soon to be added similar people. Honestly, I don't care much for adding the creatures, I was just pointing out how it wouldn't conflict and how they'd be an alright addition. Please learn to argue AND explain your point expicitly. I don't even like the Taurethrim and Morwaith because i think they don't fit in the Tolkiel world, why should i not complain when someone is advocating for adding something that has nothing to do with Tolkien. SoM and SoW are not Tolkien works, they are a tick, a parasite, using LOTR name and brand to drive sales while at the same time spitting in the face of both lore and themes of the original LOTR canon. Quite frankly it could have been a completely separate series and nothing would have changed, since it's quite clear that the creators knowledge of LOTR lore is shallower then a puddle.