Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-209.0.138.91-20190331150627/@comment-25931200-20200125102808

Rittmeister64 wrote: TheStudyOfTheUnknown wrote: In fact, the reason scientist and historians tend to put little value in recorded history from the ancient era was how subject it was to exaggeration or bias. nope, that is not a fact, bro. the main reason scientists and historians tend to put little value in recorded history from the ancient era is that they are afraid, some are cowards, to be called "Biblical nutjobs", as well as having a huge bias and blindspot, and most are only experts in a certain small field and unable or unwilling to cross-check with other sciences. i.e. Historians often have no clue about Geology, Archeology, Astronomy, etc, and on top there is a very big political bias too. For example the retarded CO2 "the science is settled" thing simply is an agenda, not real science. The goal "blame CO2" was created first and then all these "scientists" go along to try and prove a foregone conclusion, as well as not rock the boat, not get ridiculed, and get their big money grants for their research (and lifestyle). Whatever dude, you want to put more stock into some hack with a good story over a rigorous scientiffic method you are free to do so, but until you produce evidence you are just howling into the wind.