Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-26350183-20160515072146/@comment-25012056-20160516094735

Wargaz cc wrote: WillyWyvern wrote: I feel like people ruin the fun of things for the sake of being strictly canon, and I mean strict.

 WillyWyvern  Import me Mithril 22:45, May 15, 2016 (UTC) LysurusPeriphragmoides789 wrote: I think a balance of lore-based and movie based features is best. For example, the Uruk-hai seem mostly based of the movies, and they look awesome, and are still decently canon, even with crossbowers and berserkers.

L.P.789  Lord of the Arthropods  (send message) I feel like people ruin the fun of things for the sake of being uncanon, and I mean strict.

Northmen are underpowered because of balance. The armour of Rohan are made of iron but worth only bronze levels. In the Greater Rohan, Isengard are received uncanonical and overpowered crossbowers and berserkers, and Dunlendings are received berserkers, too, but Rohan have terrible equipment and armours. Please tell me, how could this be a little bit balance? Without high valves of Uruk-hai equipment, who will ever like those foul-mouthed Isengarders in both the mod and the book?

Not only the Northmen but also Ents are underpowered. In the lore, arrows are no use against Ents. They cannot be poisoned. They have a variety of appearances:chestnut, fir (the tallest Ents), ash, birch, rowan, and linden. What I asked Mevans himself, he said that not all of features of ordinary Ents will be added, and some features will be introduced on bosses. Then, he added Mallorn Ents. It isn't that people ruin the fun of things for the sake of being uncanon and an unbalanced balance?

Rohirrim cavalry are fast to the point where a horde of them is nearly invincible. Mallorn Ents were added to balance the concept of a boss, so that there is one for both sides.

Gen. Grievous1138 (admin) comlink 09:47, May 16, 2016 (UTC)