Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-25661985-20160519131239/@comment-25661985-20160525120527

Gorbag12 wrote: Angmar shouldt removed. Only their soawn rate should be increased and these shouldt do invasions (maybe only very, very rare in lone lands, coldfells and ettenmors). Some Hillmen still remain and after thousand years its logic that these are more populated. I also dont thinthinkt it would be romoved, as i said only weaker, i dont think mevans spend hours and hours to code and gruk to texture to remove them later. Angmar is cool and should stay. (But i agree with the hobbit and ruffian things) Angmar won't be removed, and it will be replaced by Trolls the faction. We know that Free folks got Fangorn that only populated by Ents and Huorns. For balance, canon, realistic, evil side should have Trolls the faction which only populated by Trolls.

"Hillmen still remain and after thousand years" There are many quotes can veto your untenable statement, and I will re-post them here again: "‘Who lives in this land?’ he asked. ‘And who built these towers? Is this troll-country?’ ‘No!’ said Strider. ‘Trolls do not build. No one lives in this land. Men once dwelt here, ages ago; but none remain now. They became an evil people, as legends tell, for they fell under the shadow of Angmar. But all were destroyed in the war that brought the North Kingdom to its end. But that is now so long ago that the hills have forgotten them.’"

- The Fellowship of the Ring

"Now they had gone on far into the Lone-lands, where there were no people left, no inns, and the roads grew steadily worse. Not far ahead were dreary hills, rising higher and higher, dark with trees. On some of them were old castles with an evil look, as if they had been built by wicked people."

- The Hobbit

You see, a boisterous Lone-lands isn't only non-canon, but also illogical: Lone-lands won't be LONE with tons of Rhudaurers.