Thread:Gen. Grievous1138/@comment-26072584-20160206013700/@comment-25012056-20160213012236

Jacobdiamond10 wrote: Gen. Grievous1138 wrote:

Jacobdiamond10 wrote:

Gen. Grievous1138 wrote: Er... Sumter was a northern fort in southern territory that the south attacked and won....

Anyways, they didn't need slavery, at least not with the brutality that came with it at the time.

The South wasn't getting low on supplies, the North was burning literally everything. There weren't supplies period. XD

Gen. Grievous1138 (admin) comlink 23:43, February 11, 2016 (UTC) They were, one of the major factors the south surrendered was because they didnt have a lot of supplies to feed the soldiers. Actually, Ft. Sumter was southern all the way. "...When Confederate guns opened fire on the Union garrison at Fort Sumter...." -My history textbook

Gen. Grievous1138 (admin) comlink 20:01, February 12, 2016 (UTC) That was because the union were in Ft. Sumter, and the Union wouldn't leave so the Confederates fired.

That still means it was a Union base.... :-P

Gen. Grievous1138 (admin) comlink 01:22, February 13, 2016 (UTC)