Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-27860585-20160227122451/@comment-26347028-20160309002052

Thorin Stonehelm wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote: MrHobit1234 wrote: Also fyi it is Calaquendi(a well mix between Noldorin, Vanyarin, and Telerin troops)(swords, spears, and bows respectivly) Then they still win, but by a much more massive margin. Someone biased towards elves would probably agree. But people seem to forget that dwarves themselves are excellent archers and far more heavily armoured than elves. Regardless of how old an elf is, the dwarves are still dangerous competition to fight against. Especially if the dwarves in question are the dwarves of Khazad dum, Nogrod and Belegost (but especially khazad dum, considering that at it's height it's armies had access to mithril armour that would stop every elven blade or arrow)

Note: I am not getting involved in this debate, it just irritates me that people are saying dwarves automatically lose when they have proven time and again they can be a huge threat to any enemy they fight But best vs. best includes some truly amazing elves, but the dwarves have a fair bit of a limit on their amount they can do. Thus, while not being a massive fight, there'd be a bit of competition. But this is like having an army of Legolases and Thranduilli. They'd just wreck almost any opposition. And they're only Sindar, anyway. Calaquendi completely butcher their enemies; as shown by the Dagor Aglareb. But to say that there'd be competition in this fight is out of the question once the word 'best' is mentioned.