Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-26444332-20151226222621/@comment-26172435-20151227222010

Faenor of the Silver Laurel wrote: AlteOgre wrote: That's odd. So I take it you don't understand the concept of the devil's advocate and you do not see I'm trying to help find motives and improvements for this suggestion. 1. I understand the concept of the devil's advocate very well. I use it myself often. I'll kindly ask that you don't insult my intelligence by noting this as such.

2. The reason I'm removing this suggestion is because I can't find a way to argue against you without sounding whiny, something I detest utterly and would fight against.

1. Excuse me for misunderstanding you concluding that I 'don't like it at all' and interpreting that as a sign that you misunderstood how I interpret the role of devil's advocate. Let's focus on the content instead of quarreling about intentions. Take it from an auld ogre that it's safest to assume that people's intentions are generally positive. That holds for ogres as well.

2. May I finally point out that you don't even have to argue about anything brought forward by others in the suggestion thread you yourself opened for feedback by the community? You may freely choose to use or not use feedback and additional suggestions to edit and improve your won OP. In the end the admin team will compile all useful info gathered in this thread into an entry for the LOD, if the suggestion is considered meaningful enough by the community (i.e. 'has received at least 14 kudos'). In my view, you can personally increase the chances of this suggestion thread getting 14+ kudos (including mine) if you would edit the OP on a number of points brought forward in this thread. The OP doesn't even have to be all-inclusive on features and/or decisive on options, as the final word will be with Mevans and his team anyway. Let them decide.