Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25101690-20160208183149/@comment-26172435-20160211005839

As announced earlier in this thread, I'd illustrate reasoning/considerations/arguments with an example. I'll use the exemplary Thread:207953 for that purpose. Here's my observations and thoughts on it, when keeping in mind what we're up to:
 * The title is not specific / doesn't cover the main subjects and objectives. Staff doesn't act on this. A decent title can strongly determine whether users will check out a thread. Without a decent title, and meeting some basic requirements regarding the contents/structue of the first post, responding is inefficient. We shouldn't accept raw meat on our plates.
 * The proposals are not original (... as required in the main explanatory line at the top of the suggestions forum page!). This is not noted by both first poster and staff and users responding to the thread (except for the last poster who bothered to do a quick search, reported the result ... and killed the on-going discussion). If we do not ensure that posters can verify if their ideas are original, we're wasting efforts and we can be sure we'll continue producing a lot of 'waste' threads and posts that will only further contaminate the system. If we do not check and ensure the quality if a post upon entry, before we allow feedback by the community in an 'evaluation' phase, we'll waste efforts of everyone involved while they could have been spent on better prepared / more valuable proposals.
 * ... yesterday I had more, and much clearer, thoughts on this, very striking ones ... 2 am now ... can't continue ... need sleep ... will complete this tomorrow.