Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-31907131-20170417102331/@comment-26553378-20170417200614

Ram6 I wrote: Gandalfthegreatestwizard- EpicMithrandir wrote:

Ram6 I wrote: Resistant to fire and evils OF Morgoth, so only reistant to those things FROM Morgoth, so not sure if it would be useful. You've almost certainly read it wrong. Written meaning that, it would have been grammatically incorrect.

'Resistant to fire of Morgoth', if you take out the evils, which is one way of ascertaining grammatical correctness where multiple things belonging to one thing are concerned. It should have said 'Resistant to the fire and evils of Morgoth' if both belonged to him. Therefore they do not. So the fire is separate from Morgoth. Alright.. but add a comma next time, it makes it less confusing... it wasn't, it was blatently, resistant to fire and resistant to the evils of morgoth