Thread:LOTRMod/@comment-25793832-20160206172740/@comment-26347028-20160208081437

Darned Rabbits wrote: Maltalidenta Kwuitidherali wrote:

Dark Lord Mairon wrote: Gandalf's staff is no sword.. Glamdring will most likely do 9 dmg... Gandalf's Mace already does 8, 1 dmg of difference.

Both of those weapons have a cooldown of 100%, while Sauron's Mace does as many dmg as Gandalf's Staff on Meele... but -1 in comparasion with "Glamdring/MithrilSword/Gondolinian/Ringil" and has a cooldown speed of 65%...

If we consider the dps, Gandalf's Staff, being only a stick, does much more than Sauron's Mace... who could in one strike kill Elendil... My point being the things like 'which is only a stick' are rendered invalid because the dps takes into account the fact that Glamdring is also wielded, wheras the Mace is just a large piece of junk. You seem to think its fair to evil players to give their best weapon equal melee ability to a stone sword, whereas goods best weapon, is fine to give +8 damage, simply because its ¨Not just a stick¨ Saurons mace in not ¨just a large piece of junk,¨ he would´nt use it if it were. I think we are expirenicing some significant bias towards good here. Do stone swords do 14 damage and deal huge knockback? Gandalf's staff should be far more damaging magically and very little physically, I'd say. Otherwise, just make the weapon Glamdring and the Gandalf NPC could have such an item in his off hand like captains have coins.