User blog comment:Catfishperson/American Politics Polls./@comment-26453572-20160301125527/@comment-27264399-20160307035211

1.I called your argument religioun, becuase that's what it is! You litteraly gave no reason whatsoever of why we should deny certain people basic human rights other than "Christianity," which the majority of Americans don't agree with anyway, and is unconstituitonal. It is unconstitutional to create our laws and judge our people based of a case of severe superstision.

2. You still think people can change their sexual attractions at will? Then you do it! For just a day, feel sexually attracted to guys instead of girls!

3. You say, " Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. That's it. That's what marriage is. And no matter what the Supreme Court says, it's still a union between a man and a woman. That's how life works. After all, if we want to start changing definitions arbitrarily, let's change marriage to include a man and a cow. Or three men and two women. Or two men and a block of cheese." It is not your decision to make about the definition of marriage.

''' Thats how life works? No... that is not how "life works," that is how you personally think life should work. '''

The comparison with several people is really not accurate, (and I'm not even going to talk about the cow.) If a person loves another person, they have the right to get married.

4. Respond to it.

5.For the third time, if you think people can at will change their sexual attractions, then try it yourself!