Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25012056-20171224203125/@comment-29773086-20171224204522

"One, it's generally disrespectful to the work of the mod author. Think about it - modding the mod is basically saying that Mevans' work is not good enough."

So, by your logic, modding Minecraft as Mevans has done is basically saying that Minecraft is not good enough?

"Furthermore, people have been using submods to add things that are planned, giving people a false impression of what they will be like and, worst of all, making them think it or the lore with it is part of the actual mod."

I don't see how this is is even an issue. No one who downloads a submod thinks that everything in the submod is part of the mod; otherwise they wouldn't have to download it. I don't think anyone is under the impression that features in submods will be exactly like their future versions in the mod, either. And if this is the problem, why not just 'ban' (you can't really ban anything) submods which add planned features?