Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-25981649-20170212211906/@comment-27200931-20170213204426

AlteOgre wrote: AlteOgre wrote: Catfishperson wrote: Golden armor should be kept at iron level, that is for sure, but an armor made with iron that gives bronze protection? That makes no sense. If the normal Easterling armor is not increased to give iron protection as well, I suggest its crafting recipe be changed. The basic assumption is that the Easterlings hadn't reached a level of mastery of iron smithing that matched that of their western counterparts. This simply implies they could have used the same resources but ended up with relatively low quality finished product.

For players sense of justice I do however agree with a slightly cheaper recipe with some bronze mixed into the recipe. Nothing too odd about that. Think use of bronze, more flexible parts to connect the larger, less flexible, rough iron parts (rings!) of the armour. A ratio of 1 bronze for every 2-3 iron would do. Alternatively, part of the ingots could be replaced with iron bars. Well, have I got more news for you all (in case somebody else hadn't reported it already):

Base Rhunic Armour has the same recipe as Dunlending Armour. So the whole miscussion about rhunic armour being iron based and providing only bronze protection was rather in vain and premature ... like so many miscussions about information that just hasn't been dug out of the code and the game yet.

SHAME ON US ALL!!!

''Edit1: But wait, there's two recipes in the code, one with full iron and one with part leather. Huh? ~DiggingOgre''

''Edit2: That's freaking weird man. Only the full iron recipe worky. The one with leather no worky. Can't see the difference in why the one would be used and the other not, except the order in the code ofc, which has the full iron recipe preceding the part leather recipe. Hmm ...?'' About Edit2. Maybe the leather recipe is just a left over piece of code?