Thread:Gen. Grievous1138/@comment-26172435-20160205113737/@comment-25565811-20160207110443

Gen. Grievous1138 wrote: I have added mention of the ruins to the opening paragraphs. It is simply unnecessary. Also, Ffets is not an admin. No, I am not, it's the admins that have to take the decisions.

But I've got an opinion to that. And in my eyes, those stone ruins should be mentionend on the biome pages somehow. It's because people travel a region, find something, and want to know what it is. Then they look up the biome and should find it there. It's not necessary to describe it, but there should be at least some links. People don't read any general pages in that case, at least that's what I think, how people function.

More to the general, it's a wiki here after all. I understand it as a public place, where anyone should be able to make their contributions. Of course, admins have to set the rules. But they should also leave people enough room to be able to add something new/valuable. Also decisions should be communicated. So when you delete a page, or change stuff systematically (not in all cases, that would be too much), just leave a note on the editors/creators wall telling him/her what you did and why:
 * This gives them the opportunity to discuss the matter and better understand your reasons. Or even they learn about the sheer existence of a rule, you enforced there.
 * It also offeres you admins the opportunity to see, if and how people have their difficulties with your decisions. ... and perhaps rethink them or make you surer that you've got to keep them.
 * The third thing is, that uninvolved people might read the thread and learn about the rules, the general direction of the wiki, and get a better feeling, for what to do and what not.
 * Perhaps the community as a whole develops something better than that, what is already there.

Or at least, leave a comment in the page's history, as Mevans did here when he deleted someone's remark: ... Also, wiki pages should not credit people with discovering something. Remarks like that are extremely helpful, as other people read it and can apply this as a general rule. But I think there's also an exception for the rule above: Easter eggs may (and do) mention the first person, who discovered it.

Now, my last point is, when I added my Template:Update to the info-boxes, I noticed some edit wars going on between User:Gen. Grievous1138 and User:Wargaz cc, for example here, where they did and undid some changes several times. I did not check what exactly was the problem, I just noticed it, and I think, things like this could be avoided by better communication - just my 5 cents.