Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-71.65.116.164-20170717063424/@comment-26172435-20170717144516

High King Ithilion wrote: Doge, we appreciate your enthusiasm, but, unless Alte should correct me, I imagine he wants to handle such things.

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lómë) 11:58, July 17, 2017 (UTC)

(Reopened the thread just to answer this and the original post.)

@All:

Anyone can refer to related threads and there is no wiki rule nor expectation at my end that prevents anyone from helping out by searching related threads and bringing them to the attention in new suggestion threads.

As I'm on it, I wanted to add something in response to the first post as well:

The basic notion is original, but this relates to a feature that has been discarded on multiple occassions by Mevans: NPC formation mechanics.

''And regardings 'Advanced AI', please check this brief description of the acceptable extent of complexity potentially useful proposals could have. If one is able to describe formation mechanics based on similar simple logic, they should actually be considered and I believe we should not discard such proposals as 'FAQ violation', provided the proposal is sufficiently concrete. This proposal obviously lacks concreteness on an AI logic level, and is therefore justifiably closed. Anyone can think of many types of formations and how much fun they would add ... but what Mevans needs is simple and effective logics to code them to make it interesting for both him and server performance to add such 'Advanced AI'.''