Board Thread:Modded Servers/@comment-26236093-20151006155902/@comment-26295802-20151017221720

Argali1 wrote: Faenor of the Silver Laurel wrote:

Argali1 wrote: There is nothing wrong with learning learning a fictional langauge, but, it is not a priority. You're saying Tolkien's languages are made up... But all languages are made up, in a sense. Want to take a stroll through Thomas Hobbes' State of Nature? It's not pretty, being amoral and unreasoning. But as a previous commenter said, Tolkien was a professor of languages at Oxford, making him much more qualified to make a language than say, a random person.

Yes, I've read such works as Leviathan and John Locke's Second Treatise on Civil Government. I make it my policy to be as well read and spoken as possible. YOU ARE PUTTING WORDS IN MY MOUTH. I am fully aware of what they are based off of, but, I, unlike some people, actually take in to account what will be useful in the real world, and I am more interested in Earth than Arda. Crazy, right? No! The Earth is real, and we should devote our attentiont to her, as upposed to the fictional Arda. XD If thats your view, there's a chance you might be on the wroooooooooong wiki. ..