Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-25987328-20160413230109/@comment-26094355-20160426184154

Sinthorion wrote: Actually, this was always my point here. I stated that the topic is a matter of opinion, not reason, and you started a new debate about my statement. So it's not fair to say I would change the topic by sticking to the new topic.

I never said in this thread that your logic is wrong, all I said is that it's a matter of opinion. But you immediately labeled me as your "enemy" and started to discuss to disprove my point. That's what I mean when saying you miss the actual point of the debate. Still trying to change the subject.

It would seem to be that you practically missed the entire discussion, or did not process it well enough, to come up with this assumption. If you read my earlier reply: this discussion is no longer about opinion. Not only was the “opinionated” stuff early on a minuscule part of this discussion, but it also quickly changed, to the point that it was not substantial enough to be the main topic at all. The very nature of the debate changed the moment tangible, disprovable claims (that were no longer based on opinion) were put forward. That was not even my doing, you can thank Indomitable and Willy for that. To even cite the debate is still running on the lines of opinion shows that you didn't fully observe the progression of it at all. This is also implying you can't counter subjective with objective facts? The answer to that is: objective facts are actually the best method to disprove subjective claims, why you seem to cite objective things as not part of the discussion here is beyond me, as this is the only really tangible weight in a debate.

You are trying to say that it's all a matter of opinion, when that's simply not true. You can personally think all the movies are "only fight scenes", but it's not true. You can personally think the movies are "filled with romance', but it's not true. You're free to think whatever you want, but those claims are undeniably false, no matter what you think--that's how facts work. You can't hide behind "opinions" as a way to justify this already disproven basis, because not everything in this discussion to begin with was opinion. The outcome is tangible, undeniable fact (at least, coming from my end, with the sheer amount of evidence I've put forward).

Again, if all you have left to talk about is “logic” or “opinion”, another thread aside from this would be preferable, because it’s off topic.

 Elvenking of the Woodland Realm