Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-27264399-20151123211021/@comment-25101089-20151126162424

Aramirtheranger wrote: Heartgold1234 wrote:

Aramirtheranger wrote:

Catfishperson wrote: It is true that we can't prove that they don't exist, but we can prove that there is absoltely no reason to believe they exist. Let`s look at the reason St. Francis of Assisi became a monk. When he became sick on a military campaign, he had a vision of an angel telling him to become a holy man. There`s a few possible explanations for this vision: 1, he was so sick he was hallucinating, 2, he was crazy(unlikely given that he was an eloquent speaker later on), 3, he lied about it, or 4, it actually happened. This was just the first of many visions he had throughout his life. Concrete evidence? of course not. No evidence at all? No. If the evidence cannot be proven, it is not evidence. That is how science works. If you can prove it beyond reasonable doubt, it exists. If you put out wild theories with no proof. Like God existing… then it doesn't exist. Those are the facts. I am not a creationist nuttter, I am not a madman who fire bombs abortion clinics, I am not against science (I love science), but you are another close-minded "My way is the only good way" atheist. I'll give you two pictures of what that way of thinking can lead to. The moment you start thinking your way of thinking is automatically better than that of others, you're no better than them. So do you think your way of thinking (that no ways of thinking are better than others) is better than other ways of thinking?