Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-31507215-20170502202548/@comment-31507215-20170503172803

AlteOgre wrote: S&#039;moregoth wrote: I would like to know how it would be against WntS, though, AlteOgre.

''I consider this of the category: "Any animal, plant or food item that is not specifically mentioned in lore but that can be considered a possible addition because it is known to mankind on earth and it does not contradict lore.". The fact that it may contradict lore and theme realism, makes it more in violation of the rules. Nonetheless, Mevans clearly indicated he appreciated fleshed out proposals, which is an attenuating circumstance and therefore I felt it would be okay to just let it pass. But I guess you can feel the contradiction / dualism / even some hypocrisy in the decision making. Also consider that on the one hand the mod team at times heavily criticises the wiki moderators to allow for too much crappy proposals to get endorsed and on the other hand they themselves don't do anything to help us set better criteria and even support proposals that go against any sense of logic when looking at what they feel useful or pointless.'' Ok, that makes a lot of sense. Thank you for explaining.

I do understand that it wouldn't really work with lore, but, then again, Hobbits have cookies and hot chocolate. :)

Gorbag12 wrote: You didnt offend me, but its against the lore Understood.