Thread:SamwiseFilmore/@comment-25869554-20160606183152/@comment-26172435-20160607101511

Well, afaic it would have been justifiable to keep the separate pages on the individual structures for villages. We have pages for flowers too. There's more specific info on buildings to be shared than on flowers. So, we're pretty inconsistent with what we do aren't we?

Now, if we're to push through with reducing the number of smaller pages: I'd also do that for flowers and would not create separate pages for all these new 'Small Stone Ruins'. In that case it's justifiable to have a truckload of redirect pages for all of those 'minor features' that don't have a separate page. For all fruit trees for instance.

Alternatively, we could also decide to allow for many smaller pages, even if they'd qualify as 'stub'. Advantage will be that any change to the feature can be documented properly on its own page, without this leading to inconveniences on a multi-feature page. Example: If Mevans would decide to add additional crafting recipes for fruit tree products, dependent on the type of tree, the Fruit Tree page may expand a lot and it may be necessary to create separate pages for each type of fruit tree. Another example: If Mevans would decide to create other types of villages it would be more convenient to have separate pages for each structure that may be used in multiple village types.

Overall, I prefer to keep the individual pages and use category pages for the overview.

Regarding the earlier discussion on Stone Ruins: That concerned a different issue, related to the level of detail of info presented on the Biome pages.

Regarding content moderator work: I do both, but have limited time available. Atm I am no longen able to check all of the wiki activiteiten log, so I may miss out some communication and edits, especially when they happen when I sleep.