Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-26084195-20150510061828/@comment-26240225-20150511235913

EpicSpacePanda wrote: But if you are gonna complain about a Peter Jackson movie, make it the hobbit. The first 2 were ok-ish, but I can into the last on expecting more dragon and an epic battle. We got 5 mins of dragon, and a depressing cgi-fest of a battle. The first one was good, It stayed loyal to the book for the first part, other than the part with Azog being in it (cuz hes dead). The second one, was ok all the way up to the Dragon, then it sucked, because we only get to see like 5 mins of action, and 10 of him talking, and only like three times does he ever breathe fire. The third one: S***. I thought we were gonna see Smaug blow up laketown for a good 15 mins, but instead we got a bunch of scenes w/ bard tryna shoot Smaug with his son as a bow. He shot him with a regular bow in the book. And, they shouldnt have split up smaug's rage in two movies either. bad move by PJ. And the battle, some parts I liked, other parts nah. The only parts I liked in that movie were when the Orcs cam out of Mt. Gundabad or whatever it was supposed to be like Carn Dum or something (but they were destroyed by one second of beorn immediately), and the charge of Durin's Folk, the Dol Guldur scene, and when Bilbo sitting with Gandalf and hes cleaning his pipe. Only good scenes, and each of them lasted like 2 mins each. I pledge that one day I'll become a filmmaker and pull a Peter Jackson, and make a trilogy about a paragraph in the appendices of LOTR. ThE eNd