Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-26172435-20170318090215/@comment-26172435-20170319063316

Rocket Engineer wrote:

AlteOgre wrote: Which part of the adjustments would you think need to be corrected, and how, to make it 'feel' a 'little less overboard' in your opinion? Or would you feel the WntS list had actually already been too much 'overboard', and in what respect? I think that the most recent change ( the change being: "Any animal, plant or food item that is not specifically mentioned in lore but that can be considered a possible addition because it is known to mankind on earth and it does not contradict lore."), while it was made with good intentions, is the feather which breaks the camel's back. It really limits what you can suggest as far as depth in the mod goes. For instance, suggestions regarding wildlife or different plants, things which have potential to add to the atmosphere and ambience of the mod, are all covered by this ban.

Respectfully,

Rocket Engineer (Temp Mod)  (Send a FTL signal) Right. Now why would that be a feather that breaks the camel's back and the already present feature types metnioned in the first bullit point didn't? May I remind all that about a year ago it was common and accepted practise to close threads and ban contributors for suggestions relating on how to implement new lore based features. Did the camel still have a back?

What would you propose to change in the WntS text so the camel's back won't break? Please be concrete, provide the edited text you think would do the trick.