Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-26149161-20150731144946/@comment-26119768-20150731193716

Aarplane22 wrote: Rocket Engineer wrote: Aarplane22 wrote: Ithilion, your enthusiasm towards this subject is admirable, we share this. :) But there is no need for further bloodshed. Save your power for battles we haven't already won. There is no way they can come back, as they have no substantial evidence to put foward like we do (I made sure of that). Anything more from them would be no more less canon as the movies themselves (I think we've made that very clear, and backed it up). We have the logical evidence, better design, and undisputed majority with us. At most, I would leave a link to the thread that all of our statements are, and put this disucssion to rest.

 Elvenking of the Woodland Realm  18:08, July 31, 2015 (UTC)

http://lotrminecraftmod.wikia.com/wiki/Thread:131111 Evidence? I didn't know we were in court. Nothing like putting digital objects in a game on trial. Well, if you want to discuss objectively (with fact/logic) and not subjectively (based on opinion/bias), then of course sources are needed to back any statement. Anything subjective (the majority of the admins' posts, all bias but no backing) is not factual, only opinion, and has no place in an objective discussion. Subjective statements can't be used to prove a point, because they are not fact. This is the core structure of debating, I hope you know that. "Evidence" (or sources, however you want to put it) can be used in more places than just a court.

I have put foward every possible piece of objective source on the table, and they tip towards allowing certain movie designs, and against blind book bias. Again, anything further from the admins is purely subjective, and does not prove anything factually.

 Elvenking of the Woodland Realm  18:48, July 31, 2015  (UTC) Ah, ok. Thanks for clearing that up.