Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25012056-20170711003730/@comment-25101690-20170711170606

High King Ithilion wrote: Hey, here's a question for the community: Should canonical, documented factions include some non-canon history? I ask this because the Gundabad page had some non-canonical/uncited information on it, which I removed.

My personal belief is that mod-invented/based factions (such as Tauredain, Rhudel, Half-trolls) should include the mod (non-canon) lore, but factions well-known (with as much information as the Wainriders and up) should be based entirely in canon. What is the community's opinion on the matter?

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lómë) 15:36, July 11, 2017 (UTC) My opinion is that all information that distinguishes the mod's lore from the actual lore (or lore that is needed to understand some of the mod's design decisions such as accepting a particular LOTR adoption) must go into the article. Write about the LOTR mod lore, not about plain LOTR/ME lore. It's a good idea to clearly mention where the lore conflicts with the actual lore (although Mevans does his best to remove such occurences).