Board Thread:Bug Reports/@comment-26172435-20160415195345/@comment-26172435-20160416192940

If this is actually intended, it doesn't make sense: either the land should change to support massive bovines or the bovines should move to a more fitting environment. It's not just the ruggedness of the terrain that contradicts with 'natural environment for huge bovines', but also the thickness of the soil and porosity of the supporting rock bed. A smoother 'rolling hills' type landscape would make more sense for starters, instead of 'karstic cracked hills', 'crag' or 'bryce-like extremities'.