Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-25356210-20150729015648/@comment-27689279-20150730001639

1. Yes, although it doesn't hurt to get outside ideas

2. Yes

3. Ok, could we please get over the circle jerk of mindlessly hating on the movies? For adaptations, they have their flaws, but that does not mean everything in the movies is unusable. Uncanon? The Ring portal, Elven/Morgul portal, most (if not all) of Harad, the Mallorn Ent, the Mountain Troll Chieftan--I could go on and on about all the "uncanon" things that are currently in the mod.

The designs you claim you want untouched are no more "canon" than what the designers produced for the movies. Why? Because they both aren't described in that much detail in the books. I think it's important to remember that before the movies, there were very few good visual representations of LoTR design (other than that kids cartoon); and, it could've been way worse. So stop blindly waving around the "books" to talk down on great design, just because of where it came from.

 Elvenking of the Woodland Realm  00:16, July 30, 2015 (UTC)

(I do agree though that certain movie lore, mechanics, and time lines should not be added; in this area, the mod should stay true to the book. But the design, like armor, is more than usable)