Thread:LOTRMod/@comment-25793832-20160206172740/@comment-26347028-20160210074850

Ronshol The Black wrote: Heres what I'm getting from this long arguement:

1: Sauron is the best Maiar and can beat Gandalf.

2: Heart thinks a stick is better then a mace.

3: There is actually another Maiar who is better then Sauron.

4: Heart is argueing with what Tolkien himself said.

5: This arguement is pointless as Sinth pointed out. 1. Not best, but certainly one of the.

2. When have I said this? I said that the fact that duel wielding isn't a thing should be accounted for, so it's a extremely well forged sword (and a stick) against a lump of metal called a mace. Neither are magical.

3. Not better, but we can't exactly tell.

4. I'm arguing with what Tolkein said, not against. Using the Lord of the Rings for information against the Silmarillion is like citing the evidence that a history book is wrong in a child's story.

5. But does that devalue it? No.