Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-25981649-20171129144913/@comment-26149161-20171129182127

Kickratgames wrote: On contrary I think nurn being fertile makes sauron more evil as he is making it fertile just to farm the Heck out of it, and force humanity to work on fertile land that they will never be able to settle in slowly torturing them as they realise all this fertility will never truly be theirs.

Think about working in a beautiful land you could gain so much from living there it is so beautiful and nice yet you will never be able to 'live' on this land it will always never be yours by making them work on fertile land not only slowly destroys all thought of escape but also gives his orcs more food.

Sure sauron could tell people about this beautiful place and it's wonders how he could make them similar places but sauron would know the smart generals would know otherwise and how what sauron is actually doing with this fertile land, and if these generals know the truth they can spread it to their men and their men can spread it to the people so sauron would actually risk more by telling people of Nurn than gaining. And if he kills a ranking general who is smart it would make this generals words more believable and the general would become a martyr and sauron would lose the support of these people. And if sauron detests these truthes it would also make them more believable You're saying that: Sauron keeping this beautiful land just for the sake of it and not letting anyone live there is MORE EVIL AND IN HIS CHARACTER than razing it to the ground, defiling the remains, and befouling the streams?

Okay.

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lómë)