Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-29799424-20170304111555/@comment-25754873-20170308202907

MrHobit1234 wrote: KHAMULofHARDA wrote: High King Ithilion wrote: RevaulRen wrote: However, as of now, we do not really have e the framework for any further Galvorn equipment, i.e. weapons, so dun try it. The only known weapons made of Galvorn were those of Turin Turambar and Maeglin. Turin's is broken and buried, Maeglin's was lost when he was thrown over the wall of Gondolin. Gurthang and Anguirel were not Galvorn, my dude.

@Khamul...

I am in fact in favor of Elves being far rarer and more expensive. There is no bias in any of my suggestions, because I support *canon*, not my own faction. There should be stronger Elves, yes, but they should be far rarer and far more expensive. And Dwarves should be weak against man-sized units. Try me.

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lome) 16:22, March 8, 2017 (UTC) Asking them to be expensive and rarer doesn'tchange my point. Not sure Ithilion agrees with this but my definition of this is that the regular high elves cost like 500 alignment and 250 coins, while the warriors would cost 1,500 alignment and 750 coins. Now that I think about it 17 armor points and 35 health would be better balanced and would make more sence if it war 2,000 alignment and 1,000 coins with the lowest price being 500.