Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-4750818-20161021130554/@comment-28142742-20161025101239

As I said before: no strong opinion on the page name. As for me it's fine as it is.

But how about changing the order? Latest version on top, first (oldest) version on bottom?

Also I'm not sure if we always need to load all the version updates every time we want to check what's new. Not only does that unnecessarily add server load, but please also think about us mobile users who have to pay per KB and have slow connections anyway ...

I think the last maybe three or four versions should be left on the page and the rest can go into an "Older Updates" archive.

In the same way (and for the same reasons) I would opt for a designated "Upcoming Version" page with only the changes that are planned and confirmed for the next update.

~A~