Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-25330335-20150925013231/@comment-27723099-20150927155010

TheDwarvenGuy wrote: Sinthoniel wrote: The Indomitable wrote: Socialism is good in moderation, but if you give stuff to literally everyone it loses it's purpose. Wasting money feeding, and caring for imprisoned Human trash who shouldn't be allowed to live. More Welfare money going to a slut who doesn't try, and work. For example. Everyone is allowed to live! I'm pretty sure there are a lot of people who think you shouldn't be allowed to live. Almost all of this is based on bias, including what you are saying about them.

I think the German system is really fair. It allows everyone to survive without a job or if unable to work, but it's harder. People who get unemployment benefits must prove that they are really trying to get a job. It's very hard to abuse it.

In pure capitalism, products often become worse than they could be because the producers care more about getting money than about making a good product. Things like what Mevans does earns him no money, so he can't put much work into it. If everyone could get the money to survive without having to work for it, people could work more on such projects. Every human wants to work, to be useful. The economy works in wierd ways, let's use cars for an example:

Communism: Soviet cars were very poor quality because the car manufacturers had a monopoly because of the government.

Socialism: Germany has great cars because of socialist guidelines.

Capitalism: The US makes good cars, but not the greatest. BUT it was probably the one to innovate the automotive industry the most.

Collective capitalism: Japan makes cars that rival Germany's cars in efficiency and quality. There are many more factors for the quality of cars from specific manufacturers than the political system of the nation. I'm not even sure if the nation is of any importance.

@Edacnik We are discussing theories and facts here, not Argali's personality! Keep personal things out of it!