Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-31382381-20170307121858/@comment-31370220-20170310125813

RevaulRen wrote: True, it's non-canon. And sometimes absurd. But in areas like ring-forging, it speaks where Tolkien was silent. That is a self-contradicting statement. It has already been made clear that non-cannon ideas are (generally) not accepted. Furthermore, following the same train of thought I could invent my own theory of how mechanized vehicles were involved in the making of the Ring and demand its approval due to lack of cannon statements.