User blog comment:TheblueWizard/I am leaving, and I don't expect I will be returning... In fact I mean not to./@comment-29106566-20150627013610/@comment-29106566-20150627025829

@bluwiz First one: In my opinion those are coincedences or predictions of the author, and I am sure there are double (if not more) things that science has disproved. Also: How can someone who says "there was no big bang" attempt to back up their argument with science? As for the second link: Yes, these are almost all true. I think that the author of the bible likely included these scientific facts to attempt to increase the credibility of the bible as a source.