Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25012056-20170711003730/@comment-29773086-20170715212709

Oi! What's wrong with you all? I just stated my motive earlier, and it's nothing to be concerned about.

"Currently the page is very unambiguous in saying that it does exist, and I believe that a little ambiguity would serve not to mislead players as to its actual state in lore, and assauge the annoyance of lore purists like myself."

Why, O Mevans, Grievous and Ithilion, is that not a worthy motive?

I seek not to offend, Mevans, but how does that amount to a suggestion? If I was suggesting Utumno should be removed with this edit, I would delete the whole page, not make a small section ambiguous.

S'moregoth (thank you) was quite right in defending me. Grievous has become irrational regarding this matter, thinking it's all part of some plot to remove Utumno. I make a joke about it on the Fun and Games Board and he removes it. I jest about it on the wiki offtopic FB chat, and he removes me from the chat indefinitely. If anyone, Grievous is the one who should stop persecuting me, not I stop having doubts about Utumno.

My intent is not to remove Utumno. As I have told Grievous at least twice in Messenger, it's just a joke, and I actually don't care all that much one way or another. What I do care about is as much accuracy as possible for the history sections.