Thread:SamwiseFilmore/@comment-25869554-20160606183152/@comment-26172435-20160606200642

Yeah, the naming in the code is somewhat unfitting afaic. Maybe we can just choose to use different naming. Example: Call the coded 'Stone Ruins' "Pillar Ruins" and use the sepcific names for the 'Small Stone Ruins". We can then use the page we now use for 'Stone Ruins', under that name, but reorganize it so all the 'Stone Ruins' are presented on that page, each with a fittingly named header.

The infobox could hold an image of a Pillar Ruin, as that is still the base form.

As an alternative, we could create a category (page) for 'Common Ruins', in the same way I did for 'Common Animals' that lists all 'Stone Ruin' types and 'Orc Dungeons' (which also belong to that type of srtuctures) and create a separate page for each individual type of Ruin. This would also enable us to manage occurence information if ever there are deviations from the default 'occurs in any biome'. That would follow the same principle as I introduced for the common animals and vegetation.

I'd prefer to do the second option ... which will enable us to achieve the 1000 page milestone again ... be my guest.

If you guys agree I could create the 'Common Ruins' page, and you guys create the individual pages for the listed 'Small Stone Ruins'? Would that be workable? I won't object to you creating the common page though. Although I secretly prefer wiki page editing above all the forum moderation stuff atm.