Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-25981649-20170215202502/@comment-31907131-20170221035111

High King Ithilion wrote: I think it's okay to expand on what we don't know, so long as it is done conservatively. For example, I helped Grievous come up with names for several Nazgul. All of them could concieveably be in the lore itself, so I'm okay with that. As long as it isn't a major focus of the game, it's fine. But if we're creating huge, detailed Rhunic histories, monsters in the Harad, or Mallorn Ents, then we've gone too far.

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lome) 03:23, February 21, 2017 (UTC) Exactly. Conservative is the operative word.

On a side note,  why would you need the names of the Nazgul? I mean, when added they don't each need to have their own names. They can simply be Nazgul. Can't they?