Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-25101690-20160208183149/@comment-25133206-20160209063432

AlteOgre wrote: @Beijing: That's starting to look a lot like my proposed procedure, just a bit more disorganized, but with all basic ingredients in it. It may be useful to re-read that proposal now you're becoming more aware of some relevant aspects and the reasoning behind them. We may even find a way to get a better compromise. I am not so sure about the template requirement for suggestions. What exactly would the suggestor need to put on there? After all, it's just as easy for a fraudulent suggestor to put nonsense on the template as it is for him to put nonsense in the suggestion content.

I also don't think we need to separate suggestions between addition of new features and improvement of existing features. Yes, it's more organised, but its benefits are not worth the effort involved in categorising dozens of suggestions. Besides, only Mevans really knows which features are the easiest to add. At the very least, we should consult with him before implementing this part of your proposal.

The rest of your proposal I can agree with.

Beijing1000 (Admin) Send me an owl 06:34, February 9, 2016 (UTC)