Thread:Gen. Grievous1138/@comment-25975584-20160204235839/@comment-25565811-20160207084029

Oops, I just found this thread here. I've made those pages: because I am working on a Template:Far Harad and wanted the biome links to link to somewhere. I was not aware, that User:Gen. Grievous1138 and User:AlteOgre now are surveying the whole process and that creating biome pages now got so restrictive. Ok, AlteOgre send me a note about sub-biomes, but I thought, it was more a tip. I agree, that someone has to keep that flood of biome pages at bay.
 * Rocky Coastline
 * Far Harad River (User:Gen. Grievous1138 deleted it)
 * Far Harad Swampland

I'll ask in the future, before creating a biome page or leave it to you. But I can be quite content, 2 out of 3 of my pages made it out alive! :-)

I've got to admit, I do not understand the sub-biome concept completely. What I understood is, that some biomes inherit a lot of properties from another and are only changed a little bit. But why are they then implemented as sub-biomes and not as variants? And sometimes Mevans changes that between updates.

One other question remains in my mind: Is there any reason against leaving redirects for - lets say - Far Harad River pointing to a section of Far Harad or - lets say - White Downs pointing to a section of Eriador? I mean just for easy linking, as it is more work to type White Downs instead of White Downs and when someone changes the header of the paragraph from "White Downs" to "The White Downs", the first link will even be broken (the redirect also, but easier to fix).