Board Thread:General Mod Discussion/@comment-25981649-20170215202502/@comment-31907131-20170222033558

High King Ithilion wrote: Well, each one will be it's own character, and we can't have them be "Nazgul #3", can we?

Ithilion, Discussions Moderator (Auta i lome) 12:29, February 21, 2017 (UTC) Can't we? Why would each be its own character, anyway? They are all pretty much the same, servants of the will of Sauron. They aren't who they used to be, they are who they are now. They are all lore wise fairly interchangeable, except The Witch-King who is of course their Captain and the greatest commander of Sauron's armies. Even Khamul is just one of Nine, not one to have his own agenda or personality at this point in history, though he can of course have his own name. Nazgul by itself would be fine, and far more lore-friendly than whatever anyone can come up with.