Board Thread:Suggestions forum/@comment-30303386-20170128014514/@comment-26553378-20170128224500

i doubt that mongols rode camals to war, they were more known for their horse-based nomadic culture. also, i will agree, many different nations, especially in deserts, used camals as warsteeds.

2 um... i suppose i wouldnt expect to find a "warlord" in the middle of a desert, but i kinda would a "chieftain" either way im leaning more towards it being warlord and in fertile only.

3 red and gold, black would absorb light and become hot, highly impractical for desert warfare

Spearmen: as i said on a seperate thread, spears are a very powerful weapon, especially when fired into masses, and a unit having an infinate amount would be rather OP as well as more than slightly impractical, i would use this argument on the ax-throwers too, but unlike spears throwing axes bounce on hit (i believe) and dont shoot off like a rocket.

Elite Archer: If it is "elite" then why no mention of elite skill as compared to the normal one, faster shooting, higher damage, camo, or even just something as simple as longer range, faster arrows, or a higher accuracy. other than that unless you're planning the camo i see no reason for different armor.

Full chief armor: i see no point in this, a helm is fine, and in none of the facs is the chief armor better than regular to my knowledge, it is merely and aesthetic identifier.