Board Thread:Modded Servers/@comment-26236093-20151230224421/@comment-27722880-20160109211318

Obsidianwiz wrote:

Heartgold1234 wrote: Also, I get I'm not being the kindest but you can understand where I'm coming from, right? I come on, and about thirty minutes later I'm getting abuse from Dragon for being 'annoying as hell' and when I question him on Skype, he states that it was most likely from my formality. Now, if someone can be annoyed for so little can he be really called a good admin, especially when his fits of rage are truly terrible? I asked for Red's demotion, aye, but you can certainly see my reasoning from the thread. Even if that wasn't him, there's been one heck of a lot of 'shady shit' going on around him. Also, when they both call for my permanent banning on the server - an enact it, twice (might I say without the owners permission at least one of those times) - you can't really blame me for being so averse to them. When someone argues with Dragon, they get muted. Take 7777c for instance, he was arguing with Dragon over the fact that when he was losing an argument he proceeded to kick Eonwë from the server and threaten worse. I will not say I haven't been attacking him but when you whack a nest of wasps do you expect them not to sting? I'll admit, I've had some nasty arguments on this wiki and others, but if you look closely at each one I've been on the defence. Here, Dragon got angry and thus attacked me for no reason. Before, I was defending Edacnik but I'd like to point out I did in the end back down. I'm afraid you didn't show me any real major reasons for that so I didn't back down as fast as I should've, but still - no major harm done. Lastly, I will admit I deserve to be demoted from Moderator on the server for the trouble I've caused, but might I point out the good that has come from it? We will have managed to get rid of three high ranking members who abused their powers. Lady_Ilmare - Co-owner, Captain_Dragon23 - Admin, and Lord_Mairon - who made all the gear on the server (he certainly isn't as bad as the others but he's still a bit volatile, he could keep his position if he proves to be better in future). Now, I'm not in the best of positions but I certainly don't deserve to be banned. That was my opinion, and take it as you will. I will probably drop the argument openly here, and continue in private. However, I will respond if provoked. I agree with all of Heart's reasons wholly. As soon as I left, I kept hearing those 3 names; we've tolerated their abuse for too long. I do support their demotion, as well as the unbanning and re-promotion of those caught in the middle. Srsly obs? You just heard one side of the story