Evil has many advantages that good cannot out way, stonemasons, poison, better boss drops, rhinos, rhino riders, wargs, warg bombardiers, cheaper boss, just to name a few things. While good? It has elves who have elfbane, dwarves who have dwarfbane, and then a bunch of weak units. All good has going for it are the Rangers, wardens, scouts, a slightly less expensive 9.0 damage sword, throwing axes, and Taurethrim blowguns. So good has the advantage for ranged, but evil has all other advantages.
1,663
pages
ALL POSTS
$wagruman the white wrote:
Samoja1 wrote:
is there any good unit that can defeat a black uruk 1v1
$wagruman the white wrote:
Are outmatched in pretty much every way by Black Uruks, more armor, more attack strength, equal HP, only thing Swan knights have going for them is that they can come mounted. It's not really an advantage if the other side has units that can match it. Evil side has advantages that are not matched by anything the good side has.Samoja1 wrote:
Only advantage i can think of for the good side are rangers.
Swan knights?Jurassic Sean wrote:
It isn't. Both "sides" have advantages and disadvantages.
It isn't. Both "sides" have advantages and disadvantages.
Only advantage i can think of for the good side are rangers.
IDK, Huorns maybe, but i found them unreliable at best, and pretty inconvenient to lug atound with you,
(Edited by Samoja1)
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
(Edited by Jurassic Sean)
Jurassic Sean wrote:
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
Imo the Balance is not perfect but good enough one thing good factions need are explosives to counter Orc bombs and Khamuls fire These are siege weapons and the good side took part in sieges too
(Edited by $wagruman the white)
$wagruman the white wrote:
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
Jurassic Sean wrote:
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
Imo the Balance is not perfect but good enough one thing good factions need are explosives to counter Orc bombs and Khamuls fire These are siege weapons and the good side took part in sieges too
They described explosives as sorcery, so no to that.
(Edited by Jurassic Sean)
Honestly, good players have access to good loot via the Troll Chieftain, while evil players have to think twice about to get negative alignment with Fangorn, because only there you can get the water breathing and fire resistence. That alone and the access to better bows and in general better weapons and tools makes it quite even if you look at a pvp scenario. And a lot of servers have rules limiting the use of Olog Hai and warg bombs.
(Edited by Justakick)
Jurassic Sean wrote:
$wagruman the white wrote:
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
They described explosives as sorcery, so no to that.
Jurassic Sean wrote:
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
Imo the Balance is not perfect but good enough one thing good factions need are explosives to counter Orc bombs and Khamuls fire These are siege weapons and the good side took part in sieges too
Well PvP maybe but as far as hireable units go evil has a clear advantage.
(Edited by Samoja1)
$wagruman the white wrote:
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
Jurassic Sean wrote:
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
The thing in ME is its kinda like in WW2 Germany vs USSR Good side has less troops but Generally of Higher Quality whilest evil side (except Rhudel) Has troops of lower Quality but has a much bigger army and orc factions can easily reproduce that what they lost in war
Imo the Balance is not perfect but good enough one thing good factions need are explosives to counter Orc bombs and Khamuls fire These are siege weapons and the good side took part in sieges too
Butin this mod evil facdtion troops match or exceed good faction troops by quality, if not by numbers.
(Edited by Samoja1)
Jurassic Sean wrote: Realistically speaking, Mordor would have crushed the west in almost every way at that time. And I think Lindon Warriors are able to 1v1 a Black Uruk. The "good" side has powerful bows while the "evil" side has powerful armors. Perfectly balanced, as all things should be.
Found Thanos.
(Edited by Aragost02)
To Be Fair Dwarven units are just as good as any of the Uruks (talking damage and armor points) not to mention being way cheaper.
(Edited by A Fandom user)
2
Why is evil superior?
Hmm ... I guess this relates to the quality to be succesful in warfare?
Assuming that is the case, the answer is quite straightforward and lies in the definition of evil. In my view evil embodies those 'morally evil' traits in mankind, or any other sentient bipedal species fwiw, that alienate evil from what the average human, elf, dwarf or hobbit could consider 'normal' or 'morally good'. These are typically expressed in the main manifestations of antisocial personalities, also known as the dark triad: machiavellianism and narcissism and psychopathy. These comprehend specific traits like 'lack of empathy', 'lack of morality', 'selfishness' and 'remorselessness'. Such traits (or 'qualities') can offer any warring side a massive boost over others. In times void of war such traits obviously will not contribute in any positive manner to the well-being of societies. Logical consequence is that people or even communities, clans, parties, societies cherishing such traits thrive with the presence of 'war' against any imaginable foe in any form. They even need 'war' to justify their 'moral justice' connected to feeding these traits and the related behaviour expressed to 'fight their foes'. Absence of foes, through denying them to people with such traits, can be very effective in surpressing their expression.
Why is there so much evil growing in this world?
~ObviousOgre
#food4thought
(Edited by administrators)