<figcaption> <p class="caption">Second option</p> </figcaption></figure>
1,661
pages
ALL POSTSNeed help with build.
<p>I started another fortress build for durin's folk and am stuck on the entrance design. I have two current layouts and wanted to know which one you guys thought was more appropiate for the faction it represented. Here's the second option. It's currently incomplete, but I'm planning to maybe have a second tier with a beacon tower and defensive siege weapons.
</p>
<figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">Second option</p> </figcaption></figure>
<figcaption> <p class="caption">Second option</p> </figcaption></figure>
(Edited by THRORSONOFNAIN)
<figure class="article-thumb tright show-info-icon" style="width: 180px">
<figcaption> <p class="caption">First option</p> </figcaption></figure>Here's the original design I had planned. However, I chose to not use because it was a bit too much like Minas Tirith. Which one do you think looks better?
<figcaption> <p class="caption">First option</p> </figcaption></figure>Here's the original design I had planned. However, I chose to not use because it was a bit too much like Minas Tirith. Which one do you think looks better?
(Edited by THRORSONOFNAIN)
.png){kind=link}
<p>First one's better, in my opinion. If that's too much like Minas Tirith, then so is Cirith Ungol. Not really a huge problem.
</p>
(Edited by OneBehindTheHair)
<p>Thank you for your feedback! Looking at the second one, the segments look an awful lot like the black gate which isn't very appropiate for a dwarven stronghold. So yeah, I'm probably gonna end up using the first option.
</p>
(Edited by THRORSONOFNAIN)