<p>If you shot an allied NPC with an bow/crossbow having the "infernal" modifier it gets ignited and it takes damage from the fire, not from the arrow. Tested with Beta 33.4 + Fastcraft, friendly-fire on.
</p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
1,661
pages
ALL POSTS
All posts by TheCrafter4000
<p>I like this idea, prehaps the name needs a little rework.
</p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<p>No, this mod is for 1.7.10, and for various reasons it will not update to any newer version. So your not able to play this mod on 1.12, and your not able to use your old save.
</p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>00Fez wrote:
The should really show up on the map in my opinion. <p>It would be nice if they actually moved from one place to another but such are the limitations of minecraft and the chunk system that this seems unlikely. </p> </i></div>
<p>Its a good idea, but I guess it is very hard to code. </p>
The should really show up on the map in my opinion. <p>It would be nice if they actually moved from one place to another but such are the limitations of minecraft and the chunk system that this seems unlikely. </p> </i></div>
<p>Its a good idea, but I guess it is very hard to code. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>Minecraftmage113 wrote:
<div class="quote">TheCrafter4000 wrote:
<div class="quote">Minecraftmage113 wrote:
<div class="quote">TheCrafter4000 wrote:
<div class="quote">AlteOgre wrote:
That feature may appear simple, but I guess it's not. My gut feeling is that Mevans can use vanilla coded logic to make the farmhands harvest crops and I doubt if that part of the code is ready-to-use for cocoa. Any minecraft coders with a bit more insight in this matter?</i></div>
<span style="font-weight:normal;">Im a coder myself and I looked up some farmhand - AI code. I dont know how much code had been copied, but that make no difference. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Your right, its a bit problematicaly. The farmhand searches </span>one<span style="font-weight:normal;"> layer above the farmland for suitable plants to harvest them. Cocoa beans are growing in the air mostly </span>two<span style="font-weight:normal;"> or more layers above the farmland. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">My idea on how to fix this: Seach for tropical wood on the first layer and than search straight up for the beans. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Well, farmland isnt needed either, thats another problem, but one that can be simply fixed in the canDoHoeing() - method. All in all I dont see any bigger problems than that.</span></div>How does it handle corn?</div>How its getting handled? Because the plant on first layer is the corn plant, the Ai looks for this plant and than looks straight up as in my idea above. <p>Well, honestly I thought that corn grows on first layer as well, but it doesnt, so its an good answer on this problem. Thanks. </p> </div>It should look to the sides of the wood for beans, not directly above, it should however look directly above (and to the sides) for more wood. </div> <p>Ah...I believed that common sense is used in this forum (errare humanum est). But your right, you have to look next to the wood and not in the wood for cocoa beans, I thougth that would be clear. </p>
<div class="quote">TheCrafter4000 wrote:
<div class="quote">Minecraftmage113 wrote:
<div class="quote">TheCrafter4000 wrote:
<div class="quote">AlteOgre wrote:
That feature may appear simple, but I guess it's not. My gut feeling is that Mevans can use vanilla coded logic to make the farmhands harvest crops and I doubt if that part of the code is ready-to-use for cocoa. Any minecraft coders with a bit more insight in this matter?</i></div>
<span style="font-weight:normal;">Im a coder myself and I looked up some farmhand - AI code. I dont know how much code had been copied, but that make no difference. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Your right, its a bit problematicaly. The farmhand searches </span>one<span style="font-weight:normal;"> layer above the farmland for suitable plants to harvest them. Cocoa beans are growing in the air mostly </span>two<span style="font-weight:normal;"> or more layers above the farmland. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">My idea on how to fix this: Seach for tropical wood on the first layer and than search straight up for the beans. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Well, farmland isnt needed either, thats another problem, but one that can be simply fixed in the canDoHoeing() - method. All in all I dont see any bigger problems than that.</span></div>How does it handle corn?</div>How its getting handled? Because the plant on first layer is the corn plant, the Ai looks for this plant and than looks straight up as in my idea above. <p>Well, honestly I thought that corn grows on first layer as well, but it doesnt, so its an good answer on this problem. Thanks. </p> </div>It should look to the sides of the wood for beans, not directly above, it should however look directly above (and to the sides) for more wood. </div> <p>Ah...I believed that common sense is used in this forum (errare humanum est). But your right, you have to look next to the wood and not in the wood for cocoa beans, I thougth that would be clear. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>CreeperKid354 wrote:
What I'm saying is you wouldn't use any of your slabs or dirt paths and remake them into what they were</i></div>
<p>Well, tbh your right about this. The main point in my oppinion is the storing. If you have to remove a road (like I had) you got tons of slabs along with the normal blocks. Crafting the slabs back to the blocks make things easier. </p>
What I'm saying is you wouldn't use any of your slabs or dirt paths and remake them into what they were</i></div>
<p>Well, tbh your right about this. The main point in my oppinion is the storing. If you have to remove a road (like I had) you got tons of slabs along with the normal blocks. Crafting the slabs back to the blocks make things easier. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>CreeperKid354 wrote:
Yes but this is a lotr mod not the average minecraft thrown together piece of junk. This is the last safe haven from the outside cringiness and I want to try and keep it as close to reality (from lotr standpoints) as I can and realistically in any world fiction or no you wouldn't rip up your roads and pile them up unless you were replacing them.</i></div>
<p>Im suggesting an crafting recipe with 2 slabs resulting in one block. What are you talking about? My english isnt that good, but as far as I understand your text your thinking that Im suggesting an doubleslab replacemant. </p><p>And yes, this is one of the only mods that isnt ridiculous. </p>
Yes but this is a lotr mod not the average minecraft thrown together piece of junk. This is the last safe haven from the outside cringiness and I want to try and keep it as close to reality (from lotr standpoints) as I can and realistically in any world fiction or no you wouldn't rip up your roads and pile them up unless you were replacing them.</i></div>
<p>Im suggesting an crafting recipe with 2 slabs resulting in one block. What are you talking about? My english isnt that good, but as far as I understand your text your thinking that Im suggesting an doubleslab replacemant. </p><p>And yes, this is one of the only mods that isnt ridiculous. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>CreeperKid354 wrote:
It's not that they couldn't it's that realistically they "wouldn't" you would keep your roads the way they are until you need repairs.</i></div>
<p>Well, yes, but thats not the point for this suggestion. </p>
It's not that they couldn't it's that realistically they "wouldn't" you would keep your roads the way they are until you need repairs.</i></div>
<p>Well, yes, but thats not the point for this suggestion. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>CreeperKid354 wrote:
And tbh it's not very realistic with other substances like dirt and gravel like once it's in your roads and unless you need to repair it or something you wouldn't even give your road a second glance</i></div>
<p>I dont think so because these substances are pliable (gravel has even gravity) and that mean that they could naturaly mix up to a block again. </p>
And tbh it's not very realistic with other substances like dirt and gravel like once it's in your roads and unless you need to repair it or something you wouldn't even give your road a second glance</i></div>
<p>I dont think so because these substances are pliable (gravel has even gravity) and that mean that they could naturaly mix up to a block again. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>CreeperKid354 wrote:
I don't even planks would <p>be possible can you imagine with the tools they had then putting planks back together to its original form and stone would NEVER be remade into its original fresh from the quarry block </p> </i></div>
<p>Well, your right. </p>
I don't even planks would <p>be possible can you imagine with the tools they had then putting planks back together to its original form and stone would NEVER be remade into its original fresh from the quarry block </p> </i></div>
<p>Well, your right. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>Minecraftmage113 wrote:
Also, basically any other type of slabs... well, probably not stone as it would be rent appart, and rather a pain to piece back together, but many other types would also be able to be put back together.</i></div>
<p>Well, we can discuss about plank slabs, but stone stabs are impossible, your right. In my oppinion soil slabs are the only slabs that should be crafteable to blocks. </p>
Also, basically any other type of slabs... well, probably not stone as it would be rent appart, and rather a pain to piece back together, but many other types would also be able to be put back together.</i></div>
<p>Well, we can discuss about plank slabs, but stone stabs are impossible, your right. In my oppinion soil slabs are the only slabs that should be crafteable to blocks. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>Minecraftmage113 wrote:
<div class="quote">TheCrafter4000 wrote:
<div class="quote">AlteOgre wrote:
That feature may appear simple, but I guess it's not. My gut feeling is that Mevans can use vanilla coded logic to make the farmhands harvest crops and I doubt if that part of the code is ready-to-use for cocoa. Any minecraft coders with a bit more insight in this matter?</i></div>
<span style="font-weight:normal;">Im a coder myself and I looked up some farmhand - AI code. I dont know how much code had been copied, but that make no difference. </span> <p><span style="font-weight:normal;">Your right, its a bit problematicaly. The farmhand searches </span>one<span style="font-weight:normal;"> layer above the farmland for suitable plants to harvest them. Cocoa beans are growing in the air mostly </span>two<span style="font-weight:normal;"> or more layers above the farmland. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">My idea on how to fix this: Seach for tropical wood on the first layer and than search straight up for the beans. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Well, farmland isnt needed either, thats another problem, but one that can be simply fixed in the canDoHoeing() - method. All in all I dont see any bigger problems than that.</span> </p> </div>How does it handle corn? </div> <p>How its getting handled? Because the plant on first layer is the corn plant, the Ai looks for this plant and than looks straight up as in my idea above. </p><p>Well, honestly I thought that corn grows on first layer as well, but it doesnt, so its an good answer on this problem. Thanks. </p>
<div class="quote">TheCrafter4000 wrote:
<div class="quote">AlteOgre wrote:
That feature may appear simple, but I guess it's not. My gut feeling is that Mevans can use vanilla coded logic to make the farmhands harvest crops and I doubt if that part of the code is ready-to-use for cocoa. Any minecraft coders with a bit more insight in this matter?</i></div>
<span style="font-weight:normal;">Im a coder myself and I looked up some farmhand - AI code. I dont know how much code had been copied, but that make no difference. </span> <p><span style="font-weight:normal;">Your right, its a bit problematicaly. The farmhand searches </span>one<span style="font-weight:normal;"> layer above the farmland for suitable plants to harvest them. Cocoa beans are growing in the air mostly </span>two<span style="font-weight:normal;"> or more layers above the farmland. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">My idea on how to fix this: Seach for tropical wood on the first layer and than search straight up for the beans. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Well, farmland isnt needed either, thats another problem, but one that can be simply fixed in the canDoHoeing() - method. All in all I dont see any bigger problems than that.</span> </p> </div>How does it handle corn? </div> <p>How its getting handled? Because the plant on first layer is the corn plant, the Ai looks for this plant and than looks straight up as in my idea above. </p><p>Well, honestly I thought that corn grows on first layer as well, but it doesnt, so its an good answer on this problem. Thanks. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>Direranger50 wrote:
He's talking about player in your fellowship with pvp off, I assume.</i></div>
<p>No, about my allied NPC troops. Added that in my post now. </p>
He's talking about player in your fellowship with pvp off, I assume.</i></div>
<p>No, about my allied NPC troops. Added that in my post now. </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<div class="quote"><i>AlteOgre wrote:
That feature may appear simple, but I guess it's not. My gut feeling is that Mevans can use vanilla coded logic to make the farmhands harvest crops and I doubt if that part of the code is ready-to-use for cocoa. Any minecraft coders with a bit more insight in this matter?</i></div>
<p><span style="font-weight:normal;">Im a coder myself and I looked up some farmhand - AI code. I dont know how much code had been copied, but that make no difference. </span> </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">Your right, its a bit problematicaly. The farmhand searches </span>one<span style="font-weight:normal;"> layer above the farmland for suitable plants to harvest them. Cocoa beans are growing in the air mostly </span>two<span style="font-weight:normal;"> or more layers above the farmland. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">My idea on how to fix this: Seach for tropical wood on the first layer and than search straight up for the beans. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Well, farmland isnt needed either, thats another problem, but one that can be simply fixed in the canDoHoeing() - method. All in all I dont see any bigger problems than that.</span> </p>
That feature may appear simple, but I guess it's not. My gut feeling is that Mevans can use vanilla coded logic to make the farmhands harvest crops and I doubt if that part of the code is ready-to-use for cocoa. Any minecraft coders with a bit more insight in this matter?</i></div>
<p><span style="font-weight:normal;">Im a coder myself and I looked up some farmhand - AI code. I dont know how much code had been copied, but that make no difference. </span> </p><p><span style="font-weight:normal;">Your right, its a bit problematicaly. The farmhand searches </span>one<span style="font-weight:normal;"> layer above the farmland for suitable plants to harvest them. Cocoa beans are growing in the air mostly </span>two<span style="font-weight:normal;"> or more layers above the farmland. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">My idea on how to fix this: Seach for tropical wood on the first layer and than search straight up for the beans. </span><span style="font-weight:normal;">Well, farmland isnt needed either, thats another problem, but one that can be simply fixed in the canDoHoeing() - method. All in all I dont see any bigger problems than that.</span> </p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<p>updated my post a bit, added some of your ideas because I like them.
</p>
(Edited by TheCrafter4000)
<p><i>Maybe this had been suggested before, if thats the case I apologize for reposting.</i>
</p><p>The current trader spawning is unrealistic because trader spawning is hard-coded in each biome.
</p><p>The main idea is to use a system like the "area of influence". The probability of an trader spawning drops square with the distance to its home biome (Dale trader -> Dale). Means: An Dorwinion trader would very, very, very unlikely visit the shire, but likely visit Dale. An Good trader wouldnt visit an evil region and vice versa. How much the probabailty decreases could be adjusted, and maybe for some special cases the probability can get hardcoded as well. Another thing: Its necassary to define some "untravelled regions" like forodwaith, east rhun, dead marshes or some mountains. EDT: <i>AlteOrge</i> suggested that an integer representing the population density betwenn 0 and 10 could be used for that.
</p><p>Critism and ideas welcome!
</p>
(Edited by moderator)
<p>Hello,
</p><p>well, to say it simple: Tauredain farmhands should be able to farm cocoa beans.
</p><p>Thanks, TheCrafter4000
</p>
(Edited by moderator)
<p>Hello,
</p><p>got an small idea. How would it be if its possible to craft dirt/dirt path/gravel from its slabs? Something like "backward-crafting". That makes it easier to store large amount of slabs, created by e.g. removing some paths in a village. And this change would actually need 3 lines of code to be added, nothing big.
</p><p>Thanks, TheCrafter4000
</p>
(Edited by moderator)