Wookiee93 wrote:
This gets to the heart of a big problem I have with Tolkien's world; it's empty. When you read about Frodo's journey, he's esentially hitting a checklist of tiny locations seperated by vast expanses of nothing. This isn't very realistic, since virtually everywhere in our world is populated, with some places being more densely populated than others.
In the book, Bree-land is described as a miniscule populated region in a vast sea of nothingness. And it's implied (though not set in stone) that the four villages are the only populated places in Bree-land (and they're quite small). The Forsaken Inn is featured in the 1960 Hobbit rewrite, and it's abandoned (another iritating trope in Tolkien's world).
The mod's portrail of Bree-land is distinct from the book, and this was most likely done for gameplay reasons. If Bree-land were added exactly how it's described in the book, it would suck. So the lore has been bent (although not contridicted), to make the region more playable. The four villages are larger than they're described in the book, and Bree-land has been expanded and populated with smaller settlements (which Tolkien implied could exist).
In my opinion this doesn't go far enough, but it's a relitively satisfying medium between the Bree-land of the book and a realistic Bree-land.
As for a reason why it's so underpopulated? I dunno, it can really be whatever you want it to be. My guess would be that it's because Eriador is essentially a lawless region, with only the Shire and Bree-land having some form of civilization.
Actually your point is very good and you have good arguments, but I would say it is not right. Tolkien's world is not empty. How you've said, we cannot compare it with Medieval times, because it is not comparable. Hobbit's has golf, matches (like sulfur matches in a mod) and their lifestyle is pretty much end of 19th century in England. About Minas Tirith Tolkien said it is like Byzantium, city which is not easily comparable with other medieval european cities in that time. But at the same time Rohirrim are inspired by anglo-saxon I think and Dunlendish are comparable with celtic tribe which is definitely matter of early middle ages, so Tolkien has inspiration from many historical periods.
But despite all this is story set in early historical times (if we consider theory that Arda is our known Earth before ancient history) and the colonization of the world is still (despite of three ages of men) in its early phases (it can be compared with middle age central europe before colonization and establishing villages). Also because of there is no official ruler in lands like Bree, Eriador and so on (before reign of king Ellesar of course), there is no need to improve level of society in some places. Your point about Eriador as lawless region is right, it is actually kind of hard building a bigger civilization when outlaws and orc raids are daily bread and the same thing can be also applied for Rhovanion where despite all that orcs, evil spiders, balcoth, dragons and so on, are small islands of civilizations or human (or unhuman) societies like Beornings, Wood elves or Kingdom of Dale (and I am sure Tolkien also mentioned some Woodmen and also there were ancestors of Smeagol before ages). Also I belive there are many other small island like that which Tolkien didn't write about (it can be hidden like Púkel civilization or just not much important for main story as people of Agar or barbarian of north mentioned in stories of Angmar). This is north of Tolkiens word and as we know, the south (including kingdoms of men like Gondor and Rohan) is much populated.
I hope it's gonna be enough, also I am looking forward for your arguments :) But keep on mind that it is still Tolkiens fantasy world and evolution of civilization does not have to be same as in our history. Also sorry for my English, I am not a native, so it is probably not best and with errors.